Editorial Policy
Our commitment to educational excellence, accuracy, and responsible publishing
Editorial Standards
At Royal Nest, we maintain the highest standards of educational content creation and publication. Our editorial process ensures that all content meets rigorous criteria for accuracy, relevance, and educational value.
Our Core Principles
- ✓ Accuracy: All facts are verified through multiple reliable sources
- ✓ Credibility: Content is authored or reviewed by subject matter experts
- ✓ Educational Value: All content must provide clear learning outcomes
- ✓ Originality: Content must be original and properly attribute sources
Content Creation Process
1. Research & Planning
Our content team conducts thorough research using academic sources, peer-reviewed publications, and authoritative educational institutions. Each article begins with a comprehensive outline reviewed by subject matter experts.
2. Expert Review
All educational content is reviewed by qualified educators, researchers, or industry professionals with relevant expertise. This ensures accuracy and educational appropriateness for our target audience.
3. Fact-Checking
Our editorial team verifies all claims, statistics, and references through multiple independent sources. We maintain a database of trusted educational and academic resources for verification purposes.
4. Editorial Review
Final content undergoes editorial review for clarity, structure, grammar, and adherence to our style guide. We ensure content is accessible to our target audience while maintaining academic rigor.
Author Guidelines
Contributor Requirements
Educational Background
- • Relevant degree or professional certification
- • Demonstrated expertise in subject area
- • Previous educational or research experience
Content Standards
- • Original, well-researched content
- • Proper citation of all sources
- • Clear, accessible writing style
Source Standards
✓ Preferred Sources
- • Peer-reviewed academic journals
- • Government educational agencies
- • Established universities
- • Educational research institutions
- • Subject matter experts
⚠ Use With Caution
- • Non-peer-reviewed publications
- • Commercial educational sites
- • News articles (for context only)
- • Industry reports
✗ Not Acceptable
- • Personal blogs or opinions
- • Social media posts
- • Wikipedia (as primary source)
- • Unverified online content
Corrections & Updates
We are committed to maintaining the accuracy of our content. When errors are identified:
- Minor errors: Corrected immediately with no notation required
- Factual errors: Corrected with a note indicating the correction date
- Significant errors: Content is updated with a clear correction notice
Readers may report errors or suggest updates through our contact page. All reports are reviewed within 48 hours and addressed as appropriate.
Editorial Contact
Questions about our editorial process or suggestions for content improvements?